Table

 

Alder Flycatcher – Accepted

1. 02 Sep 1987

HY female

Southeast Farallon I. SF

1993-098

26

ph., CAS 85542

2. 27 Aug 1988

HY

Southeast Farallon I. SF

1993-102

26

ph., McKee & Erickson (2002)

3. 11 Jul 1991

male

S. Fork Kern R. Preserve KER

1991-185

17

audio, sonogram in Patten et al. (1995)

4. 30 May 1992

male

Butterbredt Spring KER

1992-149

18

 

Alder Flycatcher – In circulation

28 Sep 1991

 

vic. Westmorland IMP

2007-112

 

SDNHM 47934, Lowther (1999), Patten et al. (2003)

 

Alder Flycatcher – Not accepted, identification not established

21 Sep 1971

 

Southeast Farallon I. SF

1977-118

3

CAS 69273

04 Sep 1985

 

Southeast Farallon I. SF

1985-187

12

 

06 Sep 1987

 

Oasis MNO

1987-282

13

 

12 Jun 1988

 

vic. Lake Henshaw SD

1992-274

17

 

16 Jun 1988

 

Pt. Reyes MRN

1993-099

17

 

09 Sep 1988

 

Pt. Reyes MRN

1993-100

17

 

21 Aug 1991

 

Southeast Farallon I. SF

1993-101

27

ph.

28 May 1993

2

Butterbredt Spring KER

1993-111

19

 

11 Sep 1994

 

Galileo Hill KER

1994-185

20

 

15 Sep 1997

 

Cosumnes R. Preserve SAC

1998-047

23

 

07–11 Oct 1998

 

Galileo Hill KER

1998-161

24

ph., Erickson & Hamilton (2001)

13 Sep 2002

 

Deep Springs INY

2003-011

28

ph.

25 Oct–02 Nov 2002

 

Southeast Farallon I. SF

2003-007

29

ph., NAB 57:114

 

Alder Flycatcher – Not submitted

26 Aug 1998

 

Pt. Reyes MRN

 

 

NAB 53:101

 

 

 

 

 

Alder Flycatcher

ALDER FLYCATCHER Empidonax alnorum Brewster, 1895

Accepted: 4 (22%)

Treated in Appendix H: yes

Not accepted: 14

CBRC review: all records

Not submitted/reviewed: 1

Color image: none

This small flycatcher’s northern breeding limit extends from central Alaska and central British Columbia east to Labrador and Newfoundland. The southern limit reaches from northern North Dakota east to Connecticut and south very locally in the Appalachian Mts. from Pennsylvania to North Carolina. Most fall migrants pass around or over the western Gulf of Mexico, avoiding the southeastern Atlantic coast, then continue south through eastern Mexico to winter in South America. The species is casual or accidental in northern Alaska, Washington, Baja California Sur (15 May 1911, Howell et al. 2001), Iceland (BW 16:435-440), Bermuda, and the West Indies. In the East, this species’ spring passage is very late (mostly late May to early June), and the fall passage is early (mostly August to mid September). The species’ range and migratory habits suggest that it should be a more regular vagrant through the Pacific coast states, particularly in fall, but its true status remains an enigma. Patten et al. (1995) reviewed the Alder Flycatcher’s known status in the West.

California’s first record of the Alder Flycatcher involves a first-fall female collected on 2 September 1987 at Southeast Farallon Island—a record that the CBRC only recently accepted with confirmation by Philip Unitt of the San Diego Natural History Museum. The second record, involving another young bird in early fall at Southeast Farallon Island, was documented with in-hand photographs and measurements. The Committee has grappled with other similarly well-documented records, ultimately leaving their identification unresolved. The state’s other two CBRC-endorsed records involve singing birds in Kern County (cf. the Yellow-bellied Flycatcher account); see also Appendix H. In addition, Lowther (1999) and Patten et al. (2003) published the specimen record of a first-fall bird collected on 28 September 1991 near Westmorland, Imperial County; the Committee has not reviewed this record.

Silent Alder Flycatchers are among North America’s most difficult birds to identify with certainty, as they are very similar to the nominate eastern subspecies of the Willow Flycatcher (Stein 1963, Hussell 1990, Browning 1993, Pyle 1997a, 1997b). The Committee has reviewed several spring (28 May–16 June) and fall (4 September–2 November) records of Alder-like birds, some of which gave peet call notes (see LeGrand 1979, Lehman 1985, Whitney and Kaufman 1986, Kaufman 1990), but records not supported by diagnostic vocalizations or unequivocal in-hand data have stood little chance of receiving CBRC endorsement, given current knowledge.